Can masks be used as tools of awareness briding the gap between me and you. Is there a gap? What’s the place of ‘love’ in this?

RIDDLE 3:

Power. Who/what decides perception. Your perceptions are your limitations. You experience what you expect.

RIDDLE (replacing PROBLEM):

Problem: etymology
ate 14c., “a difficult question proposed for solution,” from Old French problème (14c.) and directly from Latin problema, from Greek problema “a task, that which is proposed, a question;” also “anything projecting, headland, promontory; fence, barrier;” also “a problem in geometry,” literally “thing put forward,” from proballein “propose,” from pro “forward” (from PIE root *per- (1) “forward”) + ballein “to throw” (from PIE root *gwele- “to throw, reach”).

I prefer the word riddles. Riddles are more open-ended, riddles are less demanding than problems. Problems assume something needs to and can be solved.

RIDDLE1:

‘Identity is given, not created’ (Field Theory: Bourdieu, Hegemony: Antonio Gramsci, Stuart Hall’s Representation, Edward Said, ‘Orientalism’).
How performing another identity produces new meanings in you and about you. How you morfing changes the way you think and speak and think about yourself. How what you call you is just a conditioned construction. How it is important to watch and be aware of our beliefs, identifications, conceptualizations, assumptions, projections.
example:

What are the views/assumptions/beliefs behind the concept of ‘problems and solutions’.
‘Problem and solution’ sounds like a remnant from the 18th century. Can’t a research also be based on associating and linking?
What are other ways of knowing?

‘problems and solutions’ is not a concept and though cannot “sound” 18th century-like, (whatever 18th century-sound-like might mean) and neither be the opposite of an associative/linking practice (whatever associative/linking might mean)
But it is the first step to define a practical mode of analyse of situations, in fact, yes, an ‘other way of knowing’ related to two “enquiry” dynamics

the first : “problematization” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problematization
For a short and accurate explanation of what problematisation is and can do , see : Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay by Michel Callon (First published in John Law, ‘Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?’ London, Routledge, 1986, pp.196-223.
For a political definition of problematisation see Foucault, Michel. “Polemics, Politics and Problematizations.” Interview by P. Rabinow, May 1984, In Essential Works of Foucault Vol. 1. The New Press, 1998 – https://foucault.info/documents/foucault.interview/

the second : a specific tactic of analyse of practices based on a ‘what if’ hypothesis; Something like a momentary fiction used as a device to see;
It goes like : let’s consider for a moment the practice we want to analyse as a solution (or a response) and let’s ask what is the problem (or the challenge) this solution/response is based on.
“How to elucidate a plural object in a framework that is also plural? By stressing an intuition common to the different epistemologies summoned together: a practice can never be analyzed on the sole plane of reality where it manifests itself but requires, for its understanding, the recourse to a second plane, if only virtual. A practice is the solution to a problem. Its non-intelligibility requires the elucidation of the problem of which it is the solution.” P. Rubio in “practice / problem / solution / research”, to come, Summer 2018